Skip to Main Content

KEYS to Teaching Success: Ethics for Georgia Educators

Introduction

Consider the following scenario:

One night at dinner, nine-year-old Nate talked with his parents, who noticed that several times he mentioned TV commercials and daytime talk shows. Eventually, Nate's father asked, "How do you know about all these TV programs?"

     "From school," Nate said. "Mrs. Sellers watches TV while we do our work."

     After some investigation, Nate's parents learned that Nate's regular teacher was on sick leave for three weeks. The substitute, a retired educator, gave the students worksheets, then watched TV on her laptop while students completed their assignments.

Understandably, this scenario would shock most readers, but unfortunately situations like this do occur in Georgia's schools. While the substitute's behavior is a matter of professional judgment, it's also a matter of ethics.

     Before you begin your first field placement, your teacher preparation program will likely require you to complete training on a teacher’s professional ethics. Georgia’s Professional Standards Commission (PSC) offers an online quiz assessing your knowledge of the state’s ethics policy for teachers. This chapter aligns with that policy, which has also been informed by several professional ethics workshops led by attorneys representing the Professional Association of Georgia Educators (PAGE).

    Once you read this chapter, you should be minimally prepared to pass the ethics quiz designed by the PSC. Even though this chapter is informed by lawyers, you should not take this chapter as legal advice. If you are a student member of PAGE, then you have access to legal advice from the PAGE legal team. Rely on them for legal advice, and use this chapter for information on how to comply with the PSC’s ten ethical standards. The PSC publishes its code of ethics on its website.

     You would be wise to read these standards before beginning any field experience in a public school. This list of standards communicates the minimum ethical expectations of Georgia’s teachers. Many local school districts publish their own more specific ethical codes which still comply with the PSC’s list.

     For instance, the PSC's standards (2022, p. 4) state that if an educator is aware of an ethical violation, the educator must report the violation as soon as possible, "but no later than ninety days from the date the educator became aware of that violation" (see note below). However, an individual school district might have its own policy stating that an educator must report ethical violations within 14 days. Because a fourteen-day window exists within the state's ninety-day window, this more specific local policy still complies with the state code.

Venn diagram illustrating how a local ethics policy is valid if it exists within the parameters of state ethics policy

The Relationship between Local and State Ethics Policies

For that reason, when you begin a field experience in a public school, read that school's ethics policy to determine whether (and how) it is more specific than the PSC policy. Knowing the standards helps you to avoid any problems.

*Note: Although the PSC's ethics code provides a specific timeline for reporting ethics violations, it does not identify who should receive the report. Consult your school's ethics officer (often the school principal) for specific instructions on who should receive any reports of ethics violations.

     

Your Right to an Attorney

     As you read and learn about the PSC’s ten ethical standards for teachers, remember that if your school or school system ever investigates you for possible breaches of the ethics code, you have the right to an attorney present (Devetter, 2021).

      The PSC’s general investigation process is to send the educator a letter informing the educator of that investigation. The letter identifies the violation, and it includes the consequences of that violation. Those consequences could include the suspension of a teaching license or the revocation of the license (which would mean removal from employment). The letter usually begins with a statement saying that if the educator agrees with the recommended consequence, then the educator can sign the letter and accept that consequence. The letter also includes an invitation to phone the investigator to explain the educator’s side of the case.

     PAGE Attorney Sean Devetter recommends that educators not sign that letter and not to phone the investigator. Again, PAGE members, even student members, have access to PAGE attorneys, and it’s always wise to first consult with an attorney, who will assist you in composing a response to the charge of ethics violations.

The Ten Standards

     The following sections of this web page dig deeper into each standard of the PSC's ethics code for teachers. The ten sections below are composed of several tabs, with each tab providing specific information about what the standard means, specific terms to understand related to the standard, and examples of how standards can be violated. Each section also includes a brief assessment of your knowledge of each standard. After completing each assessment, you might discuss your understanding with classmates, colleagues, supervisors or administrators.

Standard 1: Legal Compliance

      “An educator shall abide by federal, state and local laws and statutes” (Georgia PSC, 2022, p. 2).  That’s the first line of Standard 1. It’s pretty straightforward, right? Obey the law. Sometimes, though, people break the law without knowing about it (which isn’t an excuse, but it still happens). And other times, people can get confused by the law, or they think disobedience won’t bring severe consequences. In other words, they’re willing to take the risk.

       So even though the PSC expects all its teachers to obey all laws, it is especially concerned with three specific legal violations: 1) felonies, 2) crimes involving the “manufacture, distribution, trafficking, sale or possessing of controlled substances or marijuana,” and 3) crimes of moral turpitude (p. 2). What’s moral turpitude? The PSC’s website (n.d.) defines them this way:

Turpitude in its ordinary sense involves the idea of inherent baseness or vileness, shameful wickedness, depravity with respect to a person's duty to another or to a society in general. In its legal sense it includes everything contrary to justice, honesty, modesty or good morals.

In simpler terms, turpitude is behavior that exhibits what society deems to be blatantly, obviously wrong. However, that definition can still be confusing because people's moral codes/expectations differ. So the PSC lists examples of crimes that would NOT be considered crimes of moral turpitude.

Click on the next tab: Example Crimes of Moral Turpitude

All of the behaviors in the table below are crimes. Some, however, are considered crimes of moral turpitude, and some are not. This table, then, is designed to help you understand the concept of crimes of moral turpitude.

Considered Crimes of Moral Turpitude NOT Considered Crimes of Moral Turpitude
  • Fraudulently obtaining something of value
  • Larceny or theft by taking
  • Embezzlement
  • Murder
  • Voluntary manslaughter
  • Sale of narcotics or illegal drugs
  • Repeated failure to file federal tax returns in years they are due
  • Criminally issuing bad checks
  • Falsely reporting crimes
  • Public drunkenness
  • Driving under the influence
  • Carrying concealed weapons
  • Unlawful sales of alcohol
  • Fighting
  • Simple battery
  • Simple assault
  • Misdemeanor criminal trespass
  • Child abandonment
  • Misdemeanor offense of escape
  • Misdemeanor offense of obstructing a law enforcement officer
  • Possession of less than on ounce of marijuana
  • Conspiracy in restraint of interstate trade and commerce (a federal offense)

Remember that local policies can be more specific than state policies, so some local school systems might move a legal infraction from the right column to the left column.

Also, remember that all the behaviors in this table are crimes. Don't go out and do any of them. They all have serious consequences. Still, keep those distinctions in mind because if a teacher gets arrested and is convicted of felonies, drug-related crimes or crimes of moral turpitude, the teacher must report that conviction to the school administrator (usually the principal).

     For that reason, we should also understand how the PSC defines a conviction: If a person has been found guilty in a court of law OR if the person has pleaded no contest to one of those crimes, then the PSC considers that person guilty. Reporting our own ethics violations would be really difficult. In fact, many people would be tempted to keep that information secret, hoping the truth would never come to light. But failure to report such a conviction is a violation of another standard of teacher ethics, which we'll get to later.

     Click on the next tab, Examples of Violations.

 

 

The following choices would be considered violations of Standard 1 of Georgia's Code of Ethics for Teachers:

  1. An educator traveled to Colorado and legally purchased marijuana; then he brought it back to Georgia. When he needed quick cash, he sold the marijuana unknowingly to an undercover police officer.
  2. An educator downloaded child pornography from the internet, then distributed it to others.
  3. An educator took computer equipment and other electronics from the school and sold them online.
  4. An educator hacked into other people's bank accounts and withdrew money.
  5. An educator took mail from nearby mail boxes to find bill payments by check. The educator washed the checks and created fake ones made out to himself, which he cashed at other banks in town.

Feeling confident in your knowledge of Standard 1? Click on the next tab--Assess Yourself--to evaluate your understanding.

Read the following scenarios. All of them are violations of Standard 1. Which ones involve crimes of moral turpitude?

  1. An educator uses up all of her sick leave and needs time off to care for her sick child. She phones the school and calls in a bomb threat so that everyone can have a day off.
  2. An educator needs extra case, so she takes her mother's prescription narcotics and sells them to students at a nearby college.
  3. An educator goes to a neighborhood party and has too much to drink. She gets into an argument with another person, and the argument escalates into a fist fight and property damage.
  4. An educator goes to a wedding and drinks four glasses of champagne. While driving home she runes a red light, and the police pull her over. The officer tickets her for driving under the influence.
  5. An educator phones senior citizens and tells them they have won a federal grant. He tricks senior citizens into giving him their personal information and bank account numbers, which he uses to withdraw money from their accounts.

Answers to the assessment:

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. No

4. No

5. Yes

Standard 2: Conduct with Students

Educators should always maintain professional relationships with students, and those professional relationships extend beyond the classroom. Any of the following behaviors/actions would violate this standard:

  • Physical or verbal abuse
  • Cruelty or endangerment
  • Engaging in sexual activity or soliciting sexual activity
  • Harassment or mistreatment
  • Furnishing alcohol, tobacco or illegal/unauthorized drugs
  • Permitting others to do the above behaviors
  • Failing to prevent the illegal use of alcohol, tobacco or illegal/unauthorized drugs

Some of the above violations also fall under the purview of Standard 1 because of the drug-related crimes or crimes of moral turpitude. However, all of the behaviors listed above are considered Standard 2 ethical violations, whether they are crimes or not. You'll notice that there is much overlap across the ten ethical standards.

     Some students are over the age of 18. In the eyes of the law, they are adults. However, in the eyes of the public school system, they are students. Many people would wrongly assume that it would be permissible to pursue a romantic relationship with an adult-aged student. However, the PSC’s ethical code forbids such relationships with all students, not just minor students. Even after someone has graduated from high school, that person is considered a student until the end of the enrollment period, which is August 31st after the date of graduation (Georgia PSC, 2022, p. 1).

     Regardless of students’ ages, they deserve to be treated with respect. They deserve to feel safe around teachers, and they deserve to pursue their education without the added pressure or distraction of personal relationships with teachers. In a presentation about the PSC’s ethics code, Attorney Devetter offered this advice to preservice teachers: “Don’t hit [students], kick them, smack them, slap them, tape them, lock them in the closet, throw anything at them or sleep with them.” We might add to his advice that teachers shouldn’t do anything that even looks or sounds like those actions.

Click on the next tab: Social Media Guidelines

Professional relationships extend beyond the classroom walls as well as the boundaries of the campus. These days teachers and teacher candidates should be especially careful about what information they put online and the people they engage with online. This textbook includes an entire chapter about online communications for teachers, but for purposes of covering all ethics standards thoroughly, these guidelines apply to social media activities:

  • Don’t send friend requests to your students, and don’t accept friend requests from your students. 

  • Don’t follow your students’ social media feeds.

  • Do not post images of your school’s students, faculty or staff. Do not post information about those students, faculty or staff either. More information about this advice appears under Standard 7, which is about confidential information.

  • Keep your social media accounts private.

  • Don’t post anything on a website that you would not post to the front door of your school.

  • On your social media accounts, do not complain about work; do not complain about students; do not disparage students, colleagues or supervisors. As we’ll see in another chapter, many PSC ethics investigations have arisen from posts that educators have published on social media platforms.

To assess your online presence, conduct a Google search of yourself. If you have posted any written communication or images that would raise ethical questions for your supervisors, remove those posts immediately. If you’ve found inappropriate images of yourself that you didn’t post (remember, you’re not the only person who can take and post photos of you), take whatever measures you can to remove those images, and remember that you can contact the PAGE attorneys for advice if you need it.

Click on the next tab--Example Standard 2 Violations

All of the teacher behaviors listed below are violations of Standard 2:

  • A teacher establishes an Instagram account under an assumed name but uses her own photos in her account profile. The teacher follows her students' instagram feeds and allows her students to follow hers.
  • An educator receives text messages from a student that include personal subject matter. The educator engages in virtual conversations through those text messages and gives the student dating advice, including advice about premarital sex.
  • An educator takes a class on a field trip, where one student becomes frustrated with another. When the first student pushes the other to the ground, the teacher makes the offending student sit in the bus, unattended, for the remainder of the field trip.
  • An educator is a professional wrestler in her spare time. Her social media feeds include vulgar language, sexually-charged subject matter and fighting. She accepts friend requests from students and engages with them online.

Once you feel confident in your knowledge of standard 2, check your comprehension by clicking on the next tab--Assess Yourself.

Of the following examples, which ones reveal educators breaching the boundaries of professional relationships? 

  • An educator left his wireless phone on his desk. A student accessed the phone and read sexually explicit text messages between the teacher and her spouse. The student showed those messages to other students. 
  • An educator received text messages from an unknown phone number. The educator suspected that the messages were from a student, but couldn't be sure. The educator blocked messages and phone calls from that number.
  • An educator started a romantic relationship with an eighteen-year-old student. The relationship began in May of an academic year. The student graduated in early June. The student turned nineteen in July of that year.
  • At a high school football game, an educator at the school encountered a group of students drinking beer in the parking lot. The educator told the students to hide the beer, saying, "I don't want to know what you are doing." A parent heard the comment and reported the teacher to school administrators.
  • A teacher witnessed one student sexually harassing another. The teacher removed the offending student from the classroom and reported the sexual harassment to the principal. The principal asked for proof of the offense, and when the teacher said that she had observed the harassment, the principal said, "If you don't have proof, I can't do anything about it."

How'd you do? Click the next tab to check your answers.

Answers to Exercise 2:

1. Yes

2. No

3. Yes

4. Yes

5. The principal's behavior violated ethics. The teacher's did not.

 

Standard 3: Activity Involving Drugs and Alcohol

     Standard 3 says, "an educator shall refrain from the use of alcohol or illegal or unauthorized drugs during the course of professional practice. Of course, this standard overlaps with Standard 1, which also points to the use of unauthorized drugs, but this standard points even to legal uses of drugs and alcohol. However, it doesn't mean that you can't enjoy a glass of wine on a night out. Legally and  ethically, you can even have too much to drink--as long as you obey the law. But if an educator is assuming the role of an educator--even after regular school hours--that educator should refrain from using or being under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs or unauthorized drugs. Educators can't partake of them during school functions. Neither can they partake of them prior to fulfilling an educator role at a school function.

image of two martinis

Cocktail Hour by Edward Peters CC-BY-NC 2012

     For example, if a coach is carrying out her responsibilities at a school athletic event, she should not consume alcohol or drugs--either at the athletic event or beforehand. If an administrator is attending a weekend school dance, that administrator should not consume alcohol or drugs--not at the dance, and not before the dance. Even if an educator is not directly supervising the students during an after-school or weekend school-related event, that educator is representing the school and therefore should not consume or be under the influence of alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs.

     The code of ethics notes that educators would be considered under the influence if they show indicators such as "slurred speech, enlarged pupils, bloodshot eyes, general personality changes, lack of physical coordination, poor motor skills, memory problems, concentration problems" (Georgia PSC, 2021, p. 3). In fact, PAGE attorney Lauren Atkinson advises that teachers not attend school or school events smelling like alcohol or marijuana (2022).

     If teachers have been prescribed medications that they must take during the school day, those teachers must give the medication to the school nurse, who can administer the medication at the appropriate time.

     The code forbids use of such substances at all "during the course of professional practice," so it doesn't consider legal limits (p. 3). In fact, a school administrator can request that an educator take a drug test or a breathalyzer test. Teachers are not required to take those tests. However, if an educator refuses to take that test, the school has the right to terminate employment (Devetter, 2021).

Image of man taking a breathalyzer test

Drinkers Learn their Limit by Ashleigh Jackson/KOMU News CC-BY 2.0

Please click on the next tab: Examples of Standard 3 Violations

The following hypothetical examples would be violations of Standard 3 and would result in consequences regarding the offender's license and/or employment:

  • An educator keeps a small bottle of vodka in her desk drawer and occasionally sips on it while grading papers after school.
  • An educator takes a group of foreign language students to another country where the laws and social expectations of drinking are vastly different from the ones in Georgia. The educator drinks wine with dinner every night and allows students to do the same. The educator has not broken the law of that country but has still violated the ethical code.
  • An educator with a back spasm takes a narcotic pain killer at home, then drives to the school baseball field to help in the concession stand. The educator demonstrates a lack of balance and dizziness.

Click on the next tab, Assess Yourself.

Read the ethics scenarios below. Which ones would violate Standard 3 of the PSC's code of ethics? After reviewing these scenarios, you may check your answers by viewing the next tab:

  1. On a spring morning with heavy pollen counts, an educator suffered a sinus headache and took an over-the-counter, non-drowsy allergy medication and pain killer before going to school. The educator suffered a slight headache through the school day but managed to teach all of her classes.
  2. During a fund-raising event at the school, planned for parents and other adult community stakeholders, an educator brought his own plastic cup to the event. He drank punch from the cup, but went to his car repeatedly, where he added alcohol to his drink.
  3. After the school's team won a football playoff, the coaches took the team to a nearby pizza restaurant to celebrate. One of the assistant coaches drank one beer at the celebration, but did not get drunk.
  4. A teacher undergoing cancer treatment experienced significant pain at school, so during her planning period she went to her car and smoked marijuana, which was not prescribed by a medical professional.
  5. During an end-of-year celebration, a parent gave a "thank you" gift basket to an educator. The basket included a gift certificate to a nearby wine shop. The educator put the gift basket in his car so that the students would not see its contents.

To view the answers, please click on the next tab, Answers.

  1. No, there is no evidence that the medication altered the educator's ability to function. This educator did not violate the standard.
  2. Yes, the educator was representing the school, so even though students were not present, he violated the standard.
  3. Yes, this educator was fulfilling the responsibility of a coach, so he violated the standard.
  4. This educator absolutely violated ethical standards--Standard 3 as well as Standard 1.
  5. No alcohol was used in this scenario. In fact, this basked includes a gift card, not alcohol itself. While this educator did not violate Standard 3, there's some question about whether the educator violated Standard 5, which you can explore in a different content box of this lesson.

Now please move forward to learn about Standard 4.

Standard 4: Honesty

     The fourth ethical standard regards telling the truth, but it also applies to academic integrity and representing one's self and the school accurately. When a school or school system asks for certain information, educators should reply truthfully without omitting information that would misrepresent the truth. While this standard expects general honesty in its educators, the PSC applies its expectation to compliance with the law and compliance with policies, professional qualifications, staff development participation, academic awards and academic histories. In other words, educators should be honest on their resumes, job applications, applications for promotions, applications for awards, etc. This honesty applies to written, digital and oral information (Georgia PSC, 2022, p. 3).

Image of a resume

Resume by Biljana Jovanovic licensed as free for commercial use, pixabay

      You'll notice we have another instance of overlap across standards. These expectations overlap with Standard 1 because falsely reporting a crime falls within the definition of a crime of moral turpitude. 

      Another more common example of a standard 4 violation is an educator's dishonest request for sick leave. People in all kinds of jobs call in sick when they're not, but the frequency of a behavior doesn't make it a correct behavior, and Georgia's PSC frowns upon it. An example of this infraction would be a public school teacher who called in sick and then went shopping for wedding dresses with her daughter, who was engaged to be married (Professional Standards Commission, 2022, p. 3).

      Educators must be honest when submitting information to other federal, state, and/or local government and official agencies. An educator who falsifies an income tax form, for instance, would be in violation of this standard. An educator who falsifies test scores would also be in violation of Standard 4 (and other standards, which we'll get to later). Even when dishonesty is for the sake of students or colleagues, the dishonesty is a violation of Standard 4. Finally, being dishonest about violating another standard is a violation of this standard.

Click the next tab to see Examples of Standard 4 Violations.

The scenarios below would violate Standard 4 of the PSC's ethical code:

  1. An educator has first period planning, so eh often arrives at school an hour late. When she signs in, though, she falsely enters the time teachers are required to report to school.
  2. When filling out a job application, a potential educator writes that she had experience coaching lacrosse, when actually she had helped raise money for her daughter's team.
  3. A PSC investigator interviews an educator about her department chair's misuse of the budget. The educator claims she'd been unaware of the misuse, but later the investigator discovers emails revealing the educator's complicity with the misuse of the funds.
  4. A student repeatedly forgets to turn in a signed permission slip for a field trip. The day of the trip, the teacher calls the student's mother to seek permission. The mother grants permission by phone, so the teacher forges the mother's signature on the permission slip.

Feeling confident in your understanding of Standard 4? Check your knowledge on the next tab: Assess Yourself. 

Read the following scenarios. Which ones violate Standard 4?

  1. A teacher candidate filled out an application for employment at a Georgia public middle school. The application asked if she had ever been convicted of a felony. Several years prior, this teacher candidate had been mandated by the court to attend DUI training after receiving her second ticket for driving under the influence of alcohol. She didn't know whether that offense was a felony, so she left that question unanswered.
  2. A teacher went to a professional development conference and attended all of the required sessions to earn professional development credit. But she forgot to get the leaders of the conference sessions to sign her verification form. When the educator returned to school Monday, she scribbled a fake signature on the form and turned it in to her administrator.
  3. A teacher candidate submitted her resume with his application for a teaching positions at a local school. The qualifications for the position included an undergraduate degree in teacher education or its equivalent. Because the teacher candidate had not yet graduated, he wrote the following phrase on his resume: "BSEd in Science Education, expected June, 2023."
  4. While grocery shopping on a weekend, a teacher realized she'd been exposed to a contagious virus. That night she experienced sneezing, a headache and congestion. She didn't feel terrible, and she had no confirmation about whether she had the virus or a common cold. Still, she filled out an online form requesting a sick day. 

Click on the next tab to check your Answers.

  1. Yes
  2. Yes
  3. No
  4. No

Standard 5: Public Funds and Property

     The PSC expects educators to handle money and property honestly and transparently. Banking firewalls, password protection and other digital security measures help school personnel with honest use of resources. Still, this ethical code is necessary: “An educator trusted with public funds and property shall honor that trust with a high level of honesty, accuracy and responsibility.” Notice how this standard includes the word honesty. Here we have an overlap with Standard 4.

     This standard also applies to the uses of money generated through fundraisers. If the supervisor of a student organization manages the proceeds of a fund-raiser, then that supervisor should keep those proceeds secure, keep accurate records of the amount of funds raised and use the funds to cover the costs they were intended for. Any educators in charge of fundraisers should make a clear, explicit plan for collecting those funds and keeping them secure. Educators in charge of fundraisers should account for all money collected each day and turn money in every night. Of course, they should also document all of those collections, accounting activities and deposits (Devetter, 2021). 

     In the past, it was acceptable for teachers to deposit all of the funds into their own bank accounts and then write one check to give to the school. That just made the process simpler. But that is no longer allowed (Devetter, 2021).

image of a roll of dollar bills

Money by Pictures of Money CC-BY 2.0

     Educators supervising fund raisers should also make sure the collected funds pay for the items/services intended. If a fundraiser is meant to pay for new cheerleading uniforms, then the funds should pay for uniforms, not pom poms. If a fund-raiser generates two hundred dollars to spend on uniforms, then the entire two-hundred dollars should be spent on uniforms. The state of Georgia also has specific policies about how those funds get spent. Only certain vendors are approved by the state, and funds should be spent within a specific period of time with approval of school administrators. Before accepting responsibility for collecting funds, check with your school administrator for all the relevant guidelines.

     This standard also applies to any equipment, devices, or other items that belong to the school. For instance, if an educator has access to a school bus for driving students to a local museum, then the educator should use the bus for that purpose only and not take a side trip to the local bowling alley. If an educator has access to equipment for the school’s softball team, that educator cannot borrow the bats and gloves to use at practice for the little league team he coaches.

During the COVID pandemic, public school systems found themselves handling many issues involving teachers’ side businesses of online tutoring. There’s nothing wrong with making a little extra income and there’s nothing wrong with a teacher working with students online. But teachers cross the line when they use a public school’s laptop computer to do their private online tutoring. Neither can teachers use a public school’s textbooks, instructional documents or other resources to do private tutoring (Devetter, 2021).

      Educators behave unethically if they do any of the following things:

  • Misuse school money or property
  • Neglect to account for funds or improperly account for funds raised from students, parents or other stakeholders
  • Dishonestly submit requests for funds or for reimbursements of expenditures
  • Mix school funds with personal funds
  • Use school or school system property without authorization.

All of the following hypothetical examples are violations of Standard 5:

  • A teacher supervising candy sales for the debate team uses the cash to pay her credit card bill, then on pay day replaces the cash she borrowed.
  • An educator needing a laptop computer and projector for a church youth talent show takes equipment from her classroom and allows the church youth group to borrow it.
  • An educator with a broken down truck in the shop uses the school's minivan to drive back and forth to school until his truck is repaired.
  • A teacher enrolled in graduate courses runs out of ink cartridges and paper to complete her masters thesis, so she helps herself to those items from the school supply closet.

Of the following hypothetical scenarios, which ones would be violations of Standard 5?

  1. An educator supervised a talent contest for the local high school. Fund-raisers generated $500 for the grand prize, but the educator had not accounted for the cost of security for the event. After paying the security guards, he had only $100 for the grand prize, so that's what the talent show winner received.
  2. the track team coach managed the track team's segment of the school's athletic budget. While ordering new uniforms for the team, he also ordered himself a new pair of running shoes.
  3. The school librarian used some of her budget to subscribe to the New York Times, which was delivered daily to the school. During her planning period, she would read each day's issue of the paper.
  4. After learning the school librarian used a portion of her budget to subscribe to the New York Times, the school principal began picking up the paper each afternoon and taking it home to read.
  5. An educator in charge of the quarterly professional development meeting got her principal's approval to buy coffee and pastries to serve at the meeting. At the grocery store, she purchased coffee and pastries, plus a few other items she needed for herself. When she turned in the receipt to the principal, she had highlighted the coffee and pastries and requested reimbursement for those items only.

Click the next tab to read the Answers.

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. No

4. Yes

5. No

Standard 6: Remunerative Conduct

       In its usual sense, to remunerate means to pay a person for something, such as for work or for an item or for a service. In the context of this ethics code, however, the term refers to a tit-for-tat arrangement that would benefit the educator over the students OR that would cause a conflict of interest for the educator. Standard 6 reads this way: “An educator shall maintain integrity with students, colleagues, parents, patrons or businesses when accepting gifts, gratuities, favors and additional compensation” (p. 4)

       Public school teachers are already compensated for the work they do–they earn salaries that come with retirement funds and health insurance benefits. Sometimes, to accept gifts on top of that regular compensation extends beyond ethical bounds because it could pose a conflict of interest.

image of a gift basket

Elegant Get Well Gift Basket by Simon Tea Gifts Toronto CC-BY 2.0

      A conflict of interest occurs when someone’s personal interests influence or interfere with their professional or official interests. For instance, when Central High School plays Westside High School in football, the referee at the game should not be a graduate of either school. Hiring a Central High School graduate or a Westside High School graduate opens a conflict of interest as the official might show bias for one team over another. 

      Another example would be if a school principal’s father owns the local sporting goods store. When the school teams need equipment, if the principal urges coaches to order equipment from that store, then there arises a conflict of interest because the principal might stand to gain personally from his own employer’s expenses.

      Standard 6 of the PSC’s ethical code prohibits such conflicts of interest. Educators may not, for instance, accept gifts from parents or businesses that would present undue personal gain. It’s okay if a parent wants to give a teacher a photo frame as a thank-you for working hard all year. But if a parent gave a teacher thousands of dollars or a new computer or a trip to Maui as a thank-you for working hard all year, that gift would suggest that something more than instruction was expected for that gift. A good practice would be to report to administrators any gift valued at more than $25 (Devetter, 2021). You would not want to risk the impression of giving a student a good grade in exchange for an expensive present or the impression of giving a student a poor grade because his/her parents didn’t give an expensive present.

      The online tutoring matter explained under Standard 5 is also relevant to Standard 6. Again, there’s nothing wrong with operating an online tutoring business outside of school hours, but teachers running such a business should be careful about their business arrangements. A conflict of interest would arise if a seventh grade teacher taught algebra during the school day, then accepted payment from her students (or their parents) for tutoring them each night. In fact, it would be smart for that teacher not to accept clients from the school or school system where she works. It would even be smart for that teacher not to accept clients enrolled in the same grade level that she teaches. Setting up those boundaries would enable the teacher to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.

      This standard also involves incentives for students. Teacher cannot offer students academic incentives for non-academic work. For instance, in the fall, schools often hold canned food drives. A history teacher would be in violation of Standard 6 if he offered each student a homework grade of A for every 10 cans of food donated. Donating food has nothing to do with learning history, so that homework grade would be inappropriate remunerative conduct.

image of canned vegetables

Western Family Asparagus and New Potatoes, 1970's by Roadside Pictures, CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0

The following hypothetical scenarios would be violations of Standard 6:

1. The cheerleading coach, who also operated a dance school, required that the varsity cheerleaders attend--and pay for--her dance classes over the summer.

2. A band director collected fees for participating in the marching band, then paid himself for conducting summer band camp.

3. A student with a long-term illness received individualized instruction at home. The teacher who provided that instruction helped the student pass her courses. Afterward, the student's parents gave the teacher a gift of $2500.

Read the following scenarios. Which ones would be violations of Standard 6?

  1. A tenth grade math teacher offered assistance to students to prepare for the SAT. She accepted payment from eleventh-grade students. When tenth-grade students approached her for assistance, she referred them to another math tutor who worked in a neighboring community.
  2. The upcoming school spring fling will include a cake walk, for which the school asked parents to contribute cakes. An eighth grade teacher offered to each student an added point to the next test grade for each cake a student donated.
  3. A beloved head football coach applied for a position in another state. The football boosters learned of the job application and wanted him to stay an additional year so that their children could attempt to make the state playoffs. As an incentive, three of the boosters bought and gave the coach a new pickup truck.
  4. A history teacher applied for and won a grant funded by a local nonprofit organization. The grant proposal requested funds to pay for transportation to take her fifth graders to Savannah for the Georgia Day Parade. She reserved bus seats for twenty students' travel. Later four parents denied permission for their children to make the trip, so the history teacher asked three additional teachers to take those bus seats in exchange for their services as chaperones. 
  5. A department chair in charge of textbook acquisitions ordered a set of books for the eleventh grade. She had some left-over funds in the budget, so she ordered the books she needed for her graduate courses.

Click the next tab to see the Answers.

1. No

2. Yes

3. It depends on whether the coach accepted the truck. Accepting it would have been a violation.

4. Offering the seat to other teachers is not technically a conflict of interest; still, the teacher would have been smart to consult with the nonprofit organization for its approval to use the bus seats that way.

5. Yes

Standard 7: Confidential Information

      Teachers are supposed to keep students’ information private–grades, personal information, IEPs and accommodations, health information, even nutritional requirements. Teachers are expected to keep private any information about colleagues as well, such as annual performance reviews, insurance information, health information.

      Sometimes teachers will inadvertently divulge that private information. For example, many teachers are friends as well as colleagues, so one teacher might mention to another some details about his health status. If a colleague shares personal information with you, that information is still private, and it is not only courteous but also an ethical obligation not to share that information with others. 

      More common, though, is an accidental slip of student information. Teachers should be especially careful about that. Parents can open that opportunity, so teachers should navigate that situation strategically. When inquiring about a child’s grade, a parent will often ask, “Why did my Felicia make a C when Jared did the same work and made an A?” Discussing Jared’s performance (or any other student’s performance) would be a violation of Standard 7.

      If a parent ever tries to discuss the work of a student who is not his/her child, the best response is to say, “I cannot discuss another student’s performance with you, but your child made this grade because…”

      Respect of student privacy also extends to behavior concerns, and parents often try to wander into that private territory. Even if their questions are well-intended, teachers must maintain those information boundaries. Such situations might come up when there’s a conflict between students. For instance, if Jared and Felicia got into a fight, a parent might ask, “Why did my Felicia get suspended for two weeks when Jared got suspended for one week?” Again, Felicia’s parents can only receive information about Felicia. Jared’s consequences are Jared’s business–and his parents’ business.

Now click on the next tab to read Examples of Standard 7 Violations.

All of the following hypothetical scenarios would violate Standard 7:

1. A teacher explained to the class that Samantha's dyslexia allowed her more time than the other students on a test.

2. A student asks a teacher for clarification about his grades. The teacher opens the grade spreadsheet to show the student his grades and accidentally conceals all the other students' grades.

3. Department chair A asks department chair B if teacher C would be a good person to lead the search committee for new faculty. Department chair B replies that teacher C is expecting a baby and will be taking maternity leave after the holiday break.

Feeling confident in your knowledge of this standard? Click the next tab to Assess Yourself.

Which of the following scenarios would violate Standard 7?

  1. Eighth grader Jasmine broke down into tears during her science lab activity, which involved examining the anatomy of a frog. In the faculty lounge, the science teacher described Jasmine's behavior, and a colleague said, "That doesn't surprise me. She's on medication for anxiety."
  2. Mr. Hornsby had gall bladder surgery, so he requested a substitute for a week. During his absence, the department chair asked the substitute whether she would be available the following week, "In case Mr. Hornsby is absent longer than expected."
  3. A sixth grade teacher noticed her student Theo had head lice. She referred Theo to the nurse's office, who sent Theo home for treatment. During lunch, the teacher wrote and photocopied a letter, which she gave out to the other students with instructions to take them home to parents. The letter said, "One of our students has head lice. Please check your child to see whether the infestation has spread."
  4. Darius and Jack got into a fight at the bus line. Fighting is against the school system's code of conduct. Darius had never been in a fight at school, but Jack had been punished for fighting three previous times. Darius was placed on in-school suspension, but Jack was suspended from school for three weeks. When Jack's parents learned Darius was still going to school, they complained to the principal, who explained, "Jack has now violated the code of conduct four times, which requires that he be suspended from school."
  5. In anticipation of Valentine's Day, the fifth grade teacher planned a small celebration. She sent an email out to parents asking them to contribute snacks, drinks or paper products. She included a line in the request that said, "Out of an abundance of caution, please do not send foods that include nuts or drinks that include caffeine."

Click the next tab to see the Answers.

1. Yes, it was a violation of Standard 7 to mention Jasmine's prescriptions.

2. No. The department chair upheld the standard by keeping confidential the reason for Mr. Hornsby's absence.

3. Yes, this was a violation. The teacher did not tell the class why Theo was leaving the room, and in the letter she omitted Theo's name. Still, by giving the letters to the students, who saw Theo depart, the teacher made it very easy for the students to draw conclusions.

4. No, this was not a violation. The principal responded to the parents' complaint by focusing on Jack's offense and leaving Darius out of the discussion.

5. No, this is not a violation.   

Standard 8: Required Reports

      The eighth standard has to do with reporting violations of the code of ethics. Any educator who is aware of someone’s ethical or legal violations must report them within 90 days of becoming aware of that infraction. Neglecting to do so puts that first educator in violation of the ethical code. Nobody wants to be a tattle tale, but reporting violations helps ensure school safety and integrity. 

      Crimes that must be reported include, but are not limited to, murder, voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, aggravated battery, kidnapping, any sexual offense, any sexual exploitation of a minor, any offense involving a controlled substance and any abuse of a child if an educator has reasonable cause to believe the child has been abused.

      That list of crimes, then, means that this ethical standard also overlaps with the state of Georgia’s mandatory reporter policy, which requires that if any mandatory reporters suspect child abuse, they have 24 hours to report that suspected abuse. Mandatory reporter training is offered by the state of Georgia’s Office of the Child Advocate. For this chapter, suffice it to say that teachers are reporters, not investigators. It’s not a teacher’s responsibility to investigate a situation before reporting it. If you suspect child abuse, even if you’re not entirely sure, you must report it, and the following two strategies work well:

  • As soon as you can, but certainly within that 24 hour window, report the abuse face-to-face to your principal. If you're a teacher candidate, report it to your program supervisor and the school principal. Some local policies require reporting to the school counselor, but if you report to the principal, he/she will  make you aware of that.
  • Via email, follow up on that report. Your email to the principal (or program supervisor if applicable) can say, "I'm following up on my report on [insert date] about the suspected abuse..." The email serves as written documentation that you reported face-to-face and that you have reminded the administrator about the face-to-face report.

The written documentation simply reinforces that you have met your obligation. Administrators often juggle multiple abuse cases, so this written follow-up helps them to manage all of that information and helps you to document your responsibilities (Devetter, 2021).

Please move forward to the next tab: Office of the Child Advocate.

Because this web page offers numerous examples of ethics violations that also fall under Standard 8, we won't list more here. But we will recommend that you visit the website of the Georgia Office of the Child Advocate.

Image of the web page of Georgia's Office of the Child Advocate

Many teacher preparation programs require that their teacher candidates earn certification as mandatory reporters prior to being placed in schools for field placements. If you have not earned your mandatory reporter certificate, you can receive training and certification online at no cost at this website.

Ready to assess your knowledge of Standard 8? Click on the next tab.

This assessment is a little different from the previous ones you've completed. Read the scenarios below. Which one best complies with the expectations of Standard 8?

  1. A teacher notices bruises on her student's arms and neck. She knows the student often picks fights with older kids, so she's not sure if he is the victim of abuse or not. She makes a note of the bruises and resolves to observe the student carefully over the next few weeks to see if she notices other signs. She wants to be sure of her suspicion before reporting.
  2. A teacher hears two students talking in the restroom. One is in tears as she tells the other that her boyfriend, a nineteen year-old college student, forced her to have sex with him. The teacher interrupts and begs the girl to tell her parents.
  3. A paraprofessional notices that a student has worn the same clothes all week. The student has developed body odor and her hair is not clean. When the paraprofessional approached the student to check her spelling words, the student shrank away, as if in fear. During the class change, the paraprofessional walked to the school office and asked to see the principal to report suspected abuse.
  4. A teacher notices that a student has been pushing classmates on the playground. After redirecting the student a few times, she notices no change in behavior. She called the student's parents and left a message requesting a meeting to discuss the student's behavior. When the student returned to school the next day, he was silent, but winced when sitting at his desk. The teacher asked the student if he was in pain, but the student said no, so the teacher didn't push the issue. She decided to phone the parents again.

Once you have selected a scenario, click the next tab to check your Answers. 

The third scenario is the most appropriate form of reporting. 

In the other scenarios, educators suspected but hesitated because they weren't sure OR they put the responsibility back on a student by urging her to report to her parents. Remember that when it comes to reporting abuse, it's not our job to be sure. It's not our job to investigate. It's our job to report. 

Standard 9: Professional Conduct

Think back on the scenario at our opening anecdote–the one in which Nate’s substitute teacher watched TV while the students completed worksheets. That teacher’s behaviors are covered by this ethical standard, a catch-all standard addressing behaviors not covered under the first eight:

  • Behaviors that would be considered breach of contract, in other words, not doing what you agreed to do when you signed your contract, not fulfilling your responsibilities on time. These behaviors include resigning a teaching position before the contract has expired.
  • Behaviors that impede any educator's ability to function professionally.
  • Behaviors that put an employee's health or safety at risk.
  • Behaviors that would put at risk the health, welfare or morals of students.

image of a television

TV by Guilherme Caldas CC-BY-NC 2.0 2007

      Standard 9 overlaps with other ethical standards in that any time an educator violates the PSC's code of ethics, that educator has demonstrated unprofessional conduct. In Nate's class, the substitute neglected to do her job. Even though she was not the teacher of record, she accepted the position of teaching Nate's class for three weeks. As a retired educator, she possessed the knowledge to do just that, so by giving students worksheets, then watching TV while they worked, she did nothing more than making sure the students were present and the power was on. Furthermore, by playing TV shows on her computer, she interfered with student learning.

Click on the next tab to read Examples of Standard 9 Violations.

 

All of the hypothetical scenarios below would be violations of Standard 9:

  • A teacher uses many instructional videos in her classes, and she plays them at such a high volume that the videos can be heard in adjacent classrooms, usually disrupting instruction in those other classrooms. The teacher’s colleagues have requested that she turn down the volume on her speakers, but she refuses, saying that the request infringes on her academic freedom.

  • A teacher manages her time poorly and usually fails to submit her grade reports on time, thereby making it difficult for administrators and the registrar to fulfill their responsibilities.

  • A science teacher prefers to wear loose-fitting clothing with wide sleeves. She wears such clothes even on days when students are working in the lab with open flames and flammable chemicals.

Feeling confident in your understanding of Standard 9? Check your knowledge by clicking the next tab: Assess Yourself

Which of the following behaviors would illustrate a violation of Standard 9?

  1. A teacher drank a Big Gulp on the way to school. By the middle of first period, she needed to visit the restroom. Without a paraprofessional to watch the students, she stuck her head into the adjacent classroom and asked her colleague, who was in the middle of a lecture to “listen out” for her students while she went up the hall to the ladies’ room.

  2. A P.E. teacher instructed his students to run ten laps around the gym. While they were running, he sat on the top bleacher, read his latest issue of Sports Illustrated, and ate his chicken biscuit.

  3. A first-year teacher taught ninth grade English from August through February. But then the principal of her home-town high school phoned and explained that one of his English teachers had been in an automobile accident and couldn’t finish out the year. He offered her the position. The first-year teacher expressed interest in the position, but only if she could begin the following August because she was still under contract at her current high school.

  4.  A teacher who also served as the cheerleading coach had trouble managing her varied responsibilities. Once a week, she allowed her students to have a “free day” if they sat quietly while she organized the cheerleading schedule and caught up on her grading.

  5. A teacher often enjoyed humorous banter with students and for several weeks swapped “You’re Mama’s So Fat” jokes with his homeroom students.

Click on the next tab to check your Answers.

  1. It's unfortunate that teachers often find themselves in such situations. Nevertheless, to leave students unattended in the classroom is a violation of Standard 9.
  2. Yes, this is a Standard 9 violation.
  3. No, this is not a Standard 9 violation. The teacher honored her contract.
  4. Yes, this is a Standard 9 violation. Although coaching cheerleaders was part of her professional responsibility, so was teaching her students, which she was not doing.
  5. Yes, this is a Standard 9 violation. The jokes are inappropriate for a learning environment.

Standard 10: Testing

     The tenth standard reads this way: “Educators are expected to administer state-mandated assessments fairly and ethically.” Many local school systems add to their ethical codes to include fair and ethical administration of any assessment, regardless of whether it’s state-mandated. While it’s a shame we have to put such expectations in writing, this code expects teachers to not cheat, and they should not enable others to cheat. This code also applies to maintaining test integrity.

     Local schools also have their own codes of conduct and academic integrity, normally referred to as honor codes. Students and faculty are required to be familiar with and adhere to such honor codes, so manipulation of any assessment or scores would fall under the purview of such codes.

      Of course, teachers should never change a student’s answer on a test. Teachers should never manipulate the testing environment to give students unfair advantage or the opportunity to cheat. All teachers should be especially aware of how we administer tests and how we ensure that the testing environment is fair and secure.

      Preservice teachers are sometimes allowed to administer state-mandated tests, but only after they have received training by their assigned school systems. They should report any testing irregularities to the building’s testing coordinator. Of course, all teachers of record should make note of the following scenarios and report them immediately:

  • If a student gets sick during a test and needs to leave the classroom

  • If a student accidentally bubbles in answers in the wrong column (which happens often)

  • If computers shut down

  • If a student completes a test section very quickly

  • If any other occurrence beyond the teacher’s control interferes with the testing process

      None of the above situations is wrong or the teacher’s fault, but there have been times when students or parents have complained about unfair advantage. For instance, on one occasion a student left the classroom during a test and remained gone for a while. Then the student returned and completed the test. The student reported no obstacles to finishing, but later the student reported having less time as the other students to complete the test (Devetter, 2021). For situations like these, teachers will be wise to take careful notes of exactly what happened and how they addressed the situation.

Click on the next tab to read about the primary reason behind Standard 10: The Atlanta public Schools Controversy

      Someone new to the profession might argue that Standard 10 is redundant, that Standards 4 and 9 would already address test manipulation. The Atlanta Public Schools test-manipulation scandal, however, was so severe that the PSC must have felt the redundancy was necessary.

      Many readers of this chapter are too young to remember the Atlanta City Schools cheating scandal of 2009, but it’s the most egregious recent example of test manipulation. Between 2009-2015 investigations and court cases revealed that hundreds of school system faculty and administrators altered Criterion Referenced Competency Test scores to indicate an increase in student achievement. That increase was so great that it raised the suspicion of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and culminated in the 178 criminal indictments and 11 convictions of school personnel. That cheating scandal makes school administrators especially sensitive about how they and their employees adhere to this ethical code (Staff Reports, 2015).

666,000 Lost by Thomas Cizauskas CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0

The scenarios mentioned on this tab and the previous one already offer sufficient examples of how to comply with Standard 10. The following exercise, though, can help clarify your understanding of the state's expectations of test procedures and security. Click on the next tab: Assess Yourself.

Which of the following scenarios violates Standard 10?

  1. A teacher had state-mandated test booklets on her desk. During the class change, she stepped into the hallway to monitor student behavior. Some students lagged behind in the classroom and stole a test booklet.

  2. Before allowing students to begin, the teacher read the test script aloud, according to test instructions. When the students asked her to repeat the last sentence again, she read it word for word.

  3. To prepare students for the upcoming state-mandated test, a teacher created a study guide, using questions from the actual test.

  4.  During the week of state-mandated tests, a student contracted a communicable illness and missed a day of testing. The teacher made note of the absence and put the student on the list for the test make-up day.

  5. During test administration, a landscaper ran the lawnmower outside the classroom window for thirty minutes, disrupting students’ concentration. The teacher gave students the option of staying in the classroom during lunch to continue working on the test.

Now click on the next tab to check your Answers.

1. Yes, this violated the standard. Of course, the students are also culpable in this situation, but the teacher should have kept the test booklets secure.

2. No, this was not a violation of Standard 10.

3. Yes, this violated the standard.

4. No, this was not a standard violation.

5. Yes, this violated the standard. The teacher should have reported the disruption to her administrator (usually the principal), then followed his direction.

 

What Happens When Educators Violate the Ethics Code?

      All ten ethics standards involve some gray areas. Very often teachers (and preservice teachers) wonder whether their choices are ethical or not. If you ever wonder about the ethics of a decision, please check with your immediate supervisor, whether that’s a university professor, a department chair or a principal. It’s better to ask first than to suffer consequences later. At best, an ethics investigation can delay your certification and your employability. At worst, though, an ethics investigation can result in the revocation of a teaching license, which means the loss of a job. You have worked too hard for your certificate to put it at risk.

      Finally, remember that if you are member of PAGE, GAE or another teachers' organization that offers liability insurance, you can always consult the attorneys for those organizations, who can advise you.

      And now you can pat yourself on the back for working through an explanation of all ten standards of the ethical code for teachers. It's a lot of information, but so important to master before you enter the schools for field placements or your first job.

image of clapping hands

applause-icon is in the public domain

[[File:277021 sandermotions applause-2.wav|277021_sandermotions_applause-2]]

References

Atkinson, L. (2022, Jan. 19). PAGE professional ethics presentation. Georgia Southern University College of Education.

Devetter, D. (2021, Jan. 12). PAGE professional ethics presentation. Georgia Southern University College of Education.

Georgia Department of Education (2019). Georgia professional standards commission: The Code of ethics for Georgia educators. [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/CTAE/Documents/GAPSC-Session-Code-of-Ethics.pdf

Georgia Professional Standards Commission. (2022, Jan. 1) 505-6-.01 The code of ethics for educators. https://www.gapsc.com/Rules/Current/Ethics/505-6-.01.pdf

Georgia Professional Standards Commission (n.d.). Moral turpitude. Georgia Professional Standards Commission. https://www.gapsc.com/Ethics/MoralTurpitude.aspx

Office of Child Advocate. (n.d.) Mandated reporting. https://oca.georgia.gov/training/mandated-reporting

Staff Reports. (2015, April 2). A timeline of how the Atlanta school cheating scandal unfolded. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. https://www.ajc.com/news/timeline-how-the-atlanta-school-cheating-scandal-unfolded/jn4vTk7GZUQoRJTVR7UHK/